By Issah Olegor
The Busia Institute for Rural and Democratic Development (BIRDD) has issued a stern public statement condemning what it describes as disturbing security operations targeted at members of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP).
In a press release dated May 23, 2025, the Institute warned that such actions could erode democratic norms and constitutional protections if left unchecked.
The statement comes amid increasing public discourse and media reports alleging coordinated security raids on the private residences of several NPP stalwarts.
Though specific details of the operations remain scarce, the perceived targeting of opposition voices has sparked anxiety within Ghana’s political landscape and civil society space.
The Busia Institute, a policy think tank rooted in the democratic ideals of the late Prime Minister Dr. Kofi Abrefa Busia, expressed grave concern about the implications of these actions for the rule of law, civil liberties, and political tolerance in Ghana.
The Institute emphasized that the essence of democracy is the ability of all citizens to participate in political processes without fear or repression.
“State power must be exercised with responsibility, impartiality, and adherence to constitutional norms,” the statement read. “Political opposition is not a crime, and civil liberties must be protected.”
The Institute’s Executive Director, Anane Agyei, called for transparency and accountability in the use of security institutions, cautioning that any attempt to use state machinery as a tool for political suppression would set a dangerous precedent.
The Busia Institute stressed that law enforcement agencies must operate within legal parameters and treat all individuals with dignity and fairness, regardless of political affiliation.
The statement urged Parliament to immediately invoke its oversight responsibilities to investigate the context, legality, and proportionality of the alleged operations.
“Parliamentary scrutiny is essential to safeguard democratic governance and ensure that no institution acts beyond its constitutional remit,” the Institute stated.
In a broader call to action, the Institute implored civil society organizations, the media, and governance watchdogs to intensify their vigilance and advocacy in defense of Ghana’s democracy.
It highlighted that the defence of political freedoms and civil liberties should not be viewed through a partisan lens but rather as a collective obligation to protect the integrity of the nation.
“We urge all stakeholders to reflect soberly and act responsibly. In defending democracy, we defend Ghana,” the statement concluded.
