BY Grace Zigah
After nearly three years of legal battles, public scrutiny and procedural delays, the Accra High Court has finally brought closure to the high-profile nude photo distribution case involving controversial evangelist Patricia Asieduaa, popularly known as Nana Agradaa, and fellow cleric Pastor Emmanuel Appiah Fumum, widely called Osofo Biblical.
On Tuesday, December 16, 2025, the court convicted Nana Agradaa after she entered into a plea bargain agreement with the State.
The court imposed a GHS12,000 fine on her and further ordered her to pay GHS50,000 as compensation to the complainant, marking the formal conclusion of one of the most prominent prosecutions under the Cybersecurity Act, 2020 (Act 1038).
The case dates back to 2023, when prosecutors accused Agradaa—then an outspoken televangelist and former fetish priestess—of broadcasting nude images of Pastor Appiah Fumum on her television station and across social media platforms without his consent.
According to the prosecution, the images were aired during a live programme in which panellists openly mocked and ridiculed the pastor, an act deemed a clear violation of the cybersecurity laws that prohibit the non-consensual sharing of intimate images.
The incident triggered widespread public debate about the abuse of media platforms, religious rivalries, and the growing misuse of digital spaces for personal vendettas.
Legal Journey And Plea Bargain
The trial suffered several adjournments over the years, but momentum returned earlier this month when defence counsel informed the court that negotiations with the Office of the Attorney-General were far advanced.
The High Court subsequently directed both parties to formally file their plea bargain terms ahead of the December 16 hearing.
Importantly, the complainant, Pastor Appiah Fumum, was actively involved in the discussions and was present in court during the proceedings, a requirement under the plea bargaining framework to ensure victim participation.
At Tuesday’s sitting, the court accepted the agreement, leading to Agradaa’s conviction without the matter proceeding to a full trial.
Defence Reaction
Speaking to journalists after the ruling, counsel for Nana Agradaa said the decision to pursue a plea bargain was deliberate and pragmatic.
“This case has been running for almost three years. Opting for a plea bargain brought finality to the matter,” the lawyer stated, describing the outcome as a closure for all parties involved.
Agradaa’s Broader Legal Troubles
The conviction comes at a time when Nana Agradaa is already serving a 15-year prison sentence with hard labour for a separate case involving fraudulent religious activities.
That sentence, imposed in July 2025, stemmed from her infamous money-doubling schemes that targeted unsuspecting church members and followers.
Although the latest conviction carries only a fine and compensation order, it adds to a growing list of legal consequences tied to her public conduct and use of media platforms.
