Mahama On Sacking Spree, Contradicts Campaign Promises

The recent decision by the John Dramani Mahama-led government to revoke the appointments of thousands of Ghanaian workers has sparked widespread outrage and disappointment.

This move is seen as a stark contradiction to the campaign promises made by the National Democratic Congress (NDC) to create jobs and stimulate economic growth.

During the campaign, President Mahama promised to implement a 24-hour economy with three shifts, which would have created more job opportunities for Ghanaians.

However, the recent sackings have left many wondering if the government is truly committed to its campaign promises.

The affected workers, who were recruited under the previous Akufo-Addo government, were left in a state of uncertainty as they received letters revoking their appointments.

The Ghana Education Service (GES) has been affected, with staff receiving revocation letters effective immediately.

This decision was made in accordance with a directive from the Chief of Staff, Julius Debrah.

Many of these staff members had been waiting for months to receive their first salary, only to be told that their appointments had been revoked.

The Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) has also revoked job offers made to successful applicants in December 2024.
The Social Security and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT) has also terminated the recently recruited staff who had gone through the necessary processes.

This move has added to the growing sense of unease among job seekers and workers in the public sector.

John Mahama’s promise of a 24-hour economy was meant to transform Ghana into a self-sufficient and export-led economy.

The plan included a three-shift work schedule, legislative support, tax incentives, and regulations to facilitate businesses operating 24/7.

But, the current developments have raised concerns about the government’s commitment to job creation and employment.

However, the opposition New Patriotic Party, NPP has been quick to criticize the government’s handling of the situation, accusing them of being insensitive to the plight of workers.

-BY Daniel Bampoe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *